Saturday, August 11, 2012

Democrats' Platform Draft Gets Specific On LGBT Workplace Nondiscrimination Bill

Democrats' Platform Draft Gets Specific On LGBT Workplace Nondiscrimination Bill

The platform draft addresses both sexual orientation and gender identity in its support for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. It does not, as the ACLU had hoped, endorse a specific LGBT nondiscrimination bill focused on students. posted

Description: http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/user_images/terminal05/2012/7/10/21/chrisgeidner-17414-1341970210-2_large.jpg

Chris Geidner BuzzFeed Staff posted

In addition to the Democratic Party's draft platform language supporting marriage equality, reported earlier at BuzzFeed, BuzzFeed has obtained the draft language relating to workplace protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people and other LGBT issues:

We know that putting America back to work is job one, and we are committed to ensuring Americans do not face employment discrimination. We support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act because people should not be fired based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.

President Obama and the Democratic Party are committed to ensuring all Americans are treated fairly. This administration hosted the first-ever White House Conference on Bullying Prevention and we must continue our work to prevent vicious bullying of young people and support LGBT youth. The President’s record, from ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in full cooperation with our military leadership, to passing the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, to ensuring same-sex couples can visit each other in the hospital, reflects Democrats’ belief that all Americans deserve the same chance to pursue happiness, earn a living, be safe in their communities, serve their country, and take care of the ones they love.

In 2008, the platform's language did not include support for marriage equality and was more vague about the specifics of workplace protections:

We support the full inclusion of all families, including same-sex couples, in the life of our nation, and support equal responsibility, benefits, and protections. We will enact a comprehensive bipartisan employment non-discrimination act. We oppose the Defense of Marriage Act and all attempts to use this issue to divide us.

A "comprehensive" workplace bill has been understood by advocates to reference a bill that includes protections for both sexual orientation- and gender identity-based discrimination, but this year's draft platform language makes that understanding specific.

Although President Obama has long endorsed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, his administration took fire from advocates — and his press secretary took extensive questions from the media — about his decision in April not to sign an executive order banning federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Metro Weekly had reported earlier that then-candidate Obama had told a group in Texas in 2008 that he would support such a policy as president.

Although an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruling issued since then would appear to require the Department of Labor to protect federal contractor employees from gender identity discrimination, the Labor Department has not responded to repeated inquires about whether it is doing so.

Additionally, the American Civil Liberties Union had been pushing for the platform specifically to endorse the Student Non-Discrimination Act. Although the platform does reference anti-bullying efforts, neither that bill nor the Safe Schools Improvement Act are mentioned by name in the platform's draft language.

ACLU legislative representative Ian Thompson remained committed to seeing the bill included in the platform, telling BuzzFeed, "The Student Non-Discrimination Act has been endorsed by the Obama White House, and currently has the support of nearly 170 House members, including every member of the Democratic leadership team, as well as 40 Democratic senators. It should absolutely be included by name in the platform."

http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/dems-platform-draft-gets-specific-on-lgbt-workpla

 

Paul Ryan is Romney’s VP pick, setting up stark choice on budget issues

Paul Ryan is Romney’s VP pick, setting up stark choice on budget issues

By Philip Rucker and Rosalind S. Helderman, Updated: Saturday, August 11, 11:26 AM

NORFOLK — Mitt Romney has selected Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin as his vice presidential running mate, introducing the seven-term congressman and architect of Republicans’ budget-cutting plans at a spirited rally on the deck of a battleship here Saturday morning.

In shirt sleeves and tie, Romney promised that he and Ryan would restore the American economy by cutting deficits and growing jobs. He called Ryan a man of integrity and character rooted in his middle-class Midwestern upbringing and said he had chosen a candidate with a vision for addressing the nation’s fiscal problems.

“He’s never been content to simply curse the darkness,” Romney said of Ryan. “He’d rather light candles.”

Romney said that he and Ryan will travel the country offering a campaign focused on “American aspirations and American ideals.”

Bounding to the deck of the USS Wisconsin— a not-so-subtle nod to Ryan’s home state — Ryan used his introduction on the national stage to praise Romney as a “man for this moment,” a leader capable of resetting the economy.

“Mitt Romney is a leader with the skills, the background and the character that our country needs at a crucial time in its history. Following four years of failed leadership, the hopes of our country, which have inspired the world, are growing dim, and they need someone to revive them,” he said. “Governor Romney is the man for this moment, and he and I share one commitment: We will restore the dreams and greatness of this country.”

By selecting Ryan, Romney has made a potentially bold but risky move to reset the dynamics of the presidential election.

He has chosen the intellectual heart of the Republican party’s movement to slash deficits and signaled a desire to place the nation’s looming fiscal challenges at the center of the campaign’s final months.

But Ryan’s proposal to overhaul Medicare has already become a favorite target for Democrats, who charge that it would essentially end the popular retiree program and shred the social safety net.

Reacting to the pick, Jim Messina, campaign manager for President Obama’s reelection effort, called the Ryan’s budget proposals “radical” and said they would ensure “budget-busting tax cuts for the wealthy, while placing greater burdens on the middle class and seniors.”

Elevated to chairman of the Budget Committee with the Republican take-over of the House in the 2010 midterm elections, Ryan authored a budget proposal that called for reducing deficits to their lowest levels in decades by dramatically shrinking spending.

Notably, the plan called for reshaping Medicare into a government payment that would allow seniors to purchase private insurance, an attempt to curb the rising costs of the entitlement program.

That idea will now play a key role in critical swing states with large retiree populations, most notably Florida, where Romney and Ryan are scheduled to campaign on Monday.

The pick will likely energize a GOP base that sought a campaign with a clear vision for the country and not focused exclusively on criticizing Obama. In Norfolk, a crowd of more than 1,500 lustily cheered nearly every line of his short address, responding with more obvious enthusiasm to Ryan than to the man who chose him.

But Democrats have savored the chance to place Ryan’s prescription for deficit reduction at the heart of the presidential election, believing the details of the plan will convince voters that Democrats offer a fairer path to reduced deficits through a combination of spending cuts and higher taxes on the wealthy.

“As a member of Congress, Ryan rubber-stamped the reckless Bush economic policies that exploded our deficit and crashed our economy. Now the Romney-Ryan ticket would take us back by repeating the same, catastrophic mistakes,” Messina said.

While Romney’s pick does not replicate the surprise jolt of Arizona Sen. John McCain’s choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin four years ago, Ryan is nonetheless a splashier choice than several other contenders who had been considered safer options.

Two who were high on Romney’s short list of VP contenders — former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty and Ohio Sen. Rob Portman — were informed in recent days that they would not be on the ticket, according to two Republican sources. Both were scheduled for other events on Saturday.

Romney made the decision to choose Ryan on Aug. 1, the day he returned to the United States from his foreign tour, according to a campaign aide.

With the selection of Ryan, Romney offers voters the starkest possible choice on how to address issues of spending and taxing, embracing Ryan’s single-minded focus on reducing the nation’s debt without raising taxes.

David Winston, a pollster who has advised House Republicans, said the pick ensures that a Romney win would represent more than just a referendum on Obama and would hand the new Republican president a governing mandate.

“If you win by a good margin, and it’s clear what you were running on, then you come into the presidency with an ability to implement those policies,” he said.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said the pick “will clearly sharpen the issues.”

“Elections are about the future direction of the country, and this choice demonstrates that Mitt Romney is doubling down on an economic agenda that benefits people like Mitt Romney at the expense of the rest of the country,” he said.

Ryan’s “Path to Prosperity,” versions of which were adopted by the GOP House in 2011 and 2012. The plans call for balancing the budget by 2040 through deep cuts to virtually every social program, from Medicaid to food stamps to Pell Grants.

Ryan has proposed raising the Medicare eligibility age to 67 and capping spending on those who turn 65 after 2023. In the future, seniors would be offered a set amount with which to purchase private health insurance on newly created federal exchanges.

To Ryan, the plan represented a forthright response to a predictable crisis of mounting debt. Only by addressing entitlement programs, he argued, could deficits be curbed.

“For too long, Washington has not been honest with the American people. Washington has been making empty promises to Americans from a government that is going broke,” Ryan said after introducing the plan in 2011.

Democrats charge that the plan would essentially end Medicare by turning it into a voucher program. Ryan counters it would save the popular program by altering its unsustainable growth rate.

Ryan’s views on budgets have been consistent in recent years — he has introduced versions of his budget since at least 2009, when support for it even among Republicans was limited.

For Democrats, Ryan is a symbol of a House majority that polls show is deeply disliked by the public. But he has, in fact, worked to remain somewhat above the fray of the congressional debates of the past year.

He played a limited role in last year’s debate over raising the nation’s debt ceiling and begged off a seat on the special deficit reduction supercommittee, which disbanded last fall in embarrassing failure.

For many voters unfamiliar with the budget debate, however, Ryan will probably start out as an unknown. According to recent polls, reviews of Ryan tilt positive in Wisconsin and nationally, but not overwhelmingly so.

And large numbers, even in his home state, don’t know enough about him to rate him favorably or unfavorably. In a CNN poll this week, Florida’s Sen. Marco Rubio was the top pick for No. 2 among Republicans and GOP-leaning independents, followed by Ryan and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie tied at 16 percent.

A 42-year-old ice fishing and fitness enthusiast, Ryan could use his boyish charm to offer digs at Obama not weighted with negativity, although he has had a tense relationship with the president. Not long after Ryan unveiled his budget framework in 2011, Obama invited the congressman to attend what the White House billed as a major economic address at George Washington University.

Obama proceeded to shock Ryan by eviscerating his plan while the congressman sat silently in the front row. “I believe it paints a vision of our future that’s deeply pessimistic,” Obama said. He said there was “nothing serious” about reducing the deficit while cutting taxes for millionaires and billionaires and nothing “courageous” about asking for sacrifices only from those who cannot afford them.

Ryan complained later that Obama had called him “un-American.”

But Ryan has appeared to develop a considerable rapport with Romney in recent months. While Romney had spent considerable time campaigning alongside each of the men considered top contenders, he seemed to particular enjoy sharing a stage with Ryan during five full days the two men spent campaigning together in the days leading up to the Wisconsin Republican primary in April.

At the time, Romney chief strategist Stuart Stevens acknowledged that the two got along together particularly well behind the scenes and noted their “chemistry” in public appearances.

Ryan’s blue-collar roots could also serve as a useful contrast to Romney’s own background of privilege.

Ryan survived on Social Security benefits as a teenager after his father died of a heart attack. He later worked at a McDonald’s and for a time drove an Oscar Meyer hot dog car.

Karen Tumulty, Lori Montgomery and Dan Balz in Washington contributed to this report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/paul-ryan-is-romneys-pick-for-vice-presidential-nominee/2012/08/11/dc2f5070-e0f1-11e1-8fc5-a7dcf1fc161d_story.html

 

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Maine's Pro-Paul Delegates Reject GOP Compromise


Written by  Joe Wolverton, II

In an apparent attempt to bind not only those delegates who support Ron Paul, but the tongues of those delegates as well, the Republican National Committee (RNC) is trying to intimidate the delegates from Maine into casting their votes for the presumptive nominee, Mitt Romney. After being rebuffed by the Maine delegation, the state's Republican Party proposed a compromise and on August 7, Maine’s delegation rejected that compromise.
The story begins in May when 21 of the 24 state delegates chosen by Maine’s Republican Party during its state convention were won by people supporting Texas Congressman Ron Paul. Last week, 20 of those 21 delegates (and 20 alternates) received an envelope with a Boston ZIP code (a ZIP code shared by the national Romney for President campaign headquarters) informing them that the RNC had received a request that the entire Maine delegation be barred from being seated at the national convention in Tampa later this month.
At issue is a challenge filed by Charlie Webster, chairman of the Maine Republican Party. Webster claims that 20 of the pro-Paul delegates were elected as the result of shenanigans at the state convention and that they should be replaced prior to the opening of the national convention in Tampa.
A committee of GOP bigwigs from around the country is scheduled to meet later this week in Washington, D.C., to hammer out an agreement regarding what role the Maine delegation should be permitted to play — if any — at the national convention.
The RNC’s “Committee on Contests” will consider not only the challenge filed in Maine, but those in other states as well. Kirsten Kukowski, spokeswoman for the RNC, said the committee will review paperwork related to the challenges this week and will meet again sometime during the week before the convention to conduct final hearings and make a decision.
Regarding the Maine slate of delegates, the challenge was filed with the RNC by Janet Staples, the state’s Republican committeewoman, and Peter Cianchette. They claim that state convention rules and applicable rules of parliamentary procedure were violated by the vociferous Ron Paul bloc who dominated the state’s delegate-selection process in May.
In the now rejected compromise, Charlie Webster listed five demands to which the delegation would be required to agree:
First, they would have to sign a statement promising to cast their vote for Mitt Romney if Ron Paul’s name was not on the ballot at the convention.
Second, Brent Tweed (a Paul supporter) would have to step aside and Webster or state Governor Paul LePage would act as spokesman for the Maine delegation and announce its vote for president at the convention. Additionally, the newly appointed spokesman would do all the talking for the delegation, especially to the media.
Third, the delegation would be forbidden from saying anything negative about Mitt Romney or positive about Barack Obama.
Fourth, in return for the foregoing commitments, the Maine delegation would be granted full access at the convention, including to all committee assignments.
Fifth, the challenge to the delegates’ election at the state convention would be dropped.
These demands were unacceptable and the entire delegation (including the 20 alternates) refused to accede to the GOP Establishment’s demands.
Webster insists that the compromise is fair and in the best of interest of Maine’s Republican Party. “I’m doing what I should do and am trying to get our delegates seated,” Webster said. “I believe there is a potential that Maine will not be seated. These rules are clear and it appears that … much of the [state] convention was not held in accordance with the rules.”
Tweed disagrees. “It is unreasonable for the Republican Party at either the national or state level, or for any campaign for president, to attempt to pressure the Maine delegation to vote any particular way," he said in a statement. "We will not be intimidated into signing political deals under threat of being unseated. We are accountable to the Maine Republicans who elected us, not the Mitt Romney campaign.”
Despite the curious and as yet unexplained fact that the envelope in which the compromise was mailed was postmarked from the same ZIP code as the Romney campaign, Webster maintains that he “never ran the proposal by the Romney campaign.”
“I’m optimistic and confident that we will be seated,” Tweed said. “We believe that we are the duly elected delegates and we are all going to Tampa.”
Regardless of the decision ultimately reached by the RNC committee considering the challenge, the more relevant question is why the Republican Establishment is leaning so hard and spending so much time and effort on the delegation from a sparsely populated state such as Maine. As the RNC knows, the answer to this important question is likely found in the Republican Party rules.
Rule 40(b) of the Rules of the Republican Party states:
Each candidate for nomination for President of the United States and Vice President of the United States shall demonstrate the support of a plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of that candidate for nomination.
There lies the rub. As the situation stands today, Ron Paul has a plurality of the delegations of seven states: Minnesota, Iowa, Nevada, Virginia, Oregon, Louisiana, and Maine. If an appropriate number of delegates from three of these states can be changed into Romney supporters, then Ron Paul would fall short of the “Five State Plurality” threshold set out in Rule 40(b).
With that in mind, it should come as no surprise that the GOP is actively working to bind the delegations in three states (including Maine) to vote for Mitt Romney, just enough to block Ron Paul’s name from being offered as a candidate on the convention floor and destroy the illusion of party unity being portrayed by the Republican Establishment.
Despite these efforts by the RNC, the truth behind the facade is found in this story from Louisiana:
Ron Paul forces in Louisiana were willing to employ "dishonest and disruptive tactics" to manipulate voting at the party's presidential caucuses and try to "hijack" the state convention to "overrule the will of nearly 200,000 presidential primary voters," according to a brief filed by the Louisiana Republican Party with the national GOP's Committee on Contests.
And, this one from Oregon:
"Texas Rep. Ron Paul won less than 13 percent of the vote in Oregon's Republican presidential primary," The Oregonian's Jeff Mapes reports, "but his supporters now make up at least half of the state's delegation to the national convention in Tampa later this month." They are mounting official credentials challenges and want full control of the delegation.
Staff at the Ron Paul 2012 campaign have made no official response to this developing story.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/12391-maines-pro-paul-delegates-reject-gop-compromise

CHARLOTTE 2012!!!!

SUPER EXCITED!!! CANT WAIT!!!
Jun 26, 2012 6:21pm

List of Democrats Skipping the Party’s National Convention Continues to Grow

There may be some extra hotel space in Charlotte, N. C. come the beginning of September, as several Democratic elected officials have announced that they will not be attending the Democratic National Convention this year.
Earlier today, Talking Points Memo reported that Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill will not be attending the convention, becoming the third Democratic senator, and eighth Democratic member of Congress, to opt out of the event.
Late Tuesday she tweeted, ” Whole lot of nothing over me campaigning w/Mo folks instead of going to convention w/party honchos. Bet POTUS agrees with my decision.”
Several of the elected officials who have decided to forgo the convention hail from places where Obama is unpopular; West Virginia’s Democratic House Rep. Nick Rahall, Sen. Joe Manchin and its governor,  Earl Ray Tomblin,  have all announced they’re not going. Obama’s low popularity in the state is perhaps best exemplified by the strong performance of prison inmate Keith Russell Judd in the state’s Democratic presidential primary. Other elected Democrats not going  include Rep. Jim Matheson of Utah and Sen. Jon Tester of Montana.
McCaskill is in the same boat as her colleagues from West Virginia, Utah and Montana, in the sense that she hails from a state where Obama is unpopular- a Gallup poll from Janury, 2012 put his approval rating in the state at just 39 percent- and she faces a tough re-election campaign this cycle.
However, her decision to stay away is significant because she was an early endorser of Obama in 2008, and a big surrogate for his campaign. Obama narrowly lost Missouri in 2008– but by a margin of less than one percentage point– making it one of the closest states in the general election. ”You can’t underestimate the importance of Claire McCaskill to this campaign,” senior Obama campaign adviser Anita Dunn said at the time. This cycle, ABC News rates the state as solidly Republican.
Democrats are not alone, Republican elected officials have opted not to attend this year’s GOP convention in Tampa Bay, Fla. as well. Recently, Montana Rep. and GOP Senate nominee Denny Rehberg announced he would not be attending. Rehberg has been distancing himself to some degree from the Republican congress, he recently ran an ad in which he criticized Paul Ryan’s budget proposal.
Party leaders skipping their party’s conventions is not an entirely new phenomenon: Claire McCaskill has actually skipped her party’s convention before, in 2004. In 2008 several GOP senators facing re-election including Susan Collins of Maine skipped out on the festivities in Minnesota.