Why the GOP gambled on Tampa
Posted by Aaron Blake on August 25, 2012 at 10:42 pm
Tampa is basically a perfect place for a major party’s
national convention — except for the weather, of course.
Republican Party officials knew that there was always
the threat of a hurricane during an August convention on the West Coast of
Florida. It rolled the dice and came up snake-eyes.
But apart from the threat of severe weather — which we
should emphasize was pretty small — and the already-tough-to-handle heat, Tampa
made a whole lot of sense as a venue.
It is the biggest swing area in the biggest swing state
in the country. Florida is worth 29 electoral votes, and the two counties
surrounding Tampa — Pinellas and Hillsborough — are two of just four counties
in Florida that flipped from Republican to Democrat between the 2004 and 2008
presidential race. Each went between 53 and 54 percent for President Obama
after favoring President Bush four years earlier.
Tampa is also at the west end of the all-important
Interstate 4 corridor, which runs from the Tampa-St. Petersburg area up to
Orlando, which swung significantly for Obama in 2008. The county south of
Orlando, Osceola, was the third of four counties to flip Democratic four years
ago, and the two media markets along the corridor reach close to half of the
state’s voters.
In other words, if there’s one area in the country where
Republicans need to perform, it might be the I-4 corridor.
Tampa was picked from among three finalists; the others
were Salt Lake City and Phoenix. Unlike those two sites, Tampa comes from an
electorally important state — a key reason it emerged as the victor.
While the two parties picked host cities for their conventions
in non-competitive states in 2004 (New York and Boston), the selections in 2008
and 2012 trended toward swing states.
Republicans held their convention in St. Paul in 2008,
while Democrats went to Denver. This year, Democrats opted for Charlotte, N.C.,
while Republicans picked Tampa. Colorado, North Carolina and Florida are all
bona fide swing states, while Minnesota generally leans slightly Democratic.
Tampa was officially selected in May, 2010. But ever
since, there has been a slight undercurrent of consternation about the
possibility of a hurricane marring the festivities.
The Tampa Bay Times even wrote a story in May
talking about the possibility of such a situation ruining the event. The story
noted that the odds of a hurricane hitting the city during the convention were
less than 1 percent.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/08/25/why-the-gop-gambled-on-tampa/
No comments:
Post a Comment